- Atheism and the “Shut Up, That’s Why” Arguments (via @JoergR)
- Cartoon: The 11th commandment (via @Jahwe)
- 2009: Shaping up to be a really bad year for antivaccinationists (via Bad Astronomy).
And the video (via Phase 5): A music video made of real images made to look like a stop motion trick:
Following
I joined the microblogging service Twitter about 2 weeks ago, writing a total of 60 tweets so far – this post is not supposed to be a proper (early) résumé about whether Twitter is useful or not, I’d just like to mention a few odd things:
- A strange but funny video by LisaNova as “Twitter Whore” (part 1, part 2;
just don’t remember who tweeted it, sorryvia this gwup tweet). - Advertising twitterers were there pretty quickly: a food company (left in the mean time) and a DIY market – what’s the use of their following but one brief attention? At least they don’t throw ad messages at you – then they’d be quickly blocked (and blogged) anyway, however.
- And there’s also offenbarung (=revelation) who tweet texts from their antique story collection – and apparently hope for re-followers who’d like to be converted if they follow many “godless” people like me. Well, apparently didn’t work out, they left again…
- And [update:] the fake account Richard_Dawkins seems to re-follow almost everyone who’s following him, regardless of the language. Whatever that may be good for… – his real account is RichardDawkins without the “_”, though he doesn’t write himself, just representatives.
The twitter bird here is one from the free Smashing Magazine collection, by the way.
Only on Wednesdays
But there actually is some variety:
FAIL³
Usually I hit the Mute button whenever there are adverts on radio, ’cause there often is a lot of annoying crap there – which I find confirmed when occasionally I do hear some ads, like shortly before New Year’s Eve.
The ad I’m refering to here was, on its own, not that bad – no silly singing around or overenthused proclamations of the oh so sensational offers etc. –, but that a brand of champagne, Mumm, that is (German), advertises the year horoscope on its website on the radio, well, even though it’s common to greet the new year with a glass of champagne, that’s a bit… odd. Since I was curious about the nonsense they babble in that horoscope, I opened that site – and it FAILs usability and content in multiple ways, I think:
FAIL #1: The start page
Translation: “Accessing this site is only allowed for persons of age. Please enter your date of birth.”
A ridiculously noneffective age verification – might this even make some visitors expect more than a little alcohol? If at least this was effective and protect children from nonsense such as horoscopes…
FAIL #2: Loud music
For if you have jumped this huge hurdle of your date of birth, a cheap pop-ish jingle including spoken slogan booms at you, and no volume control or mute button on the site. Luckily it’s “only” 15 seconds long – and lucky are those who have a Mute button on the keyboard. But the sentence “Mumm ist, wenn man’s macht” = “Courage is if you do it” does fit somehow…
FAIL #3: The horoscope itself
Which was written by a certain Michael Allgeier, also not unknown (German) in the astro scene. Again with a date-of-birth selection dialog – however, even though labeled “Your personal horoscope 2009”, there is only one text for each span of ten days. And with the ususal newspaper horosope wish-wash with general section and sections about love/relationship, job/money and fitness/wellness all over.
And they added a little lexicon which of course is so impudent to take all this stuff serious and describe astrology itself as (my translation):
A thousands of years old empirical science that puts man in a certain relationship system to the star constellations. This symbol system allows the drawing of conclusions about the individual abilities and problem areas of a person. Certain prognostic techniques also allow considerations regarding future developments or events. Also statements about relationships among persons or entire peoples can be done with the help of astrology.
(Needless to say that astrologers (a) disagree on their statements and (b) in the way they reached them – even if (c) they just say the usual shallow stuff. Needless at least among those who don’t blindly follow their astrologers…)
Somehow I got the impression that someone consumed too much of his own product to get the idea to do all this that big and in a serious manner…
See also:
Photo: vierdrie/sxc
Time (Projekt 52/02) and God and anyway…
Nice occasion to combine two topics in one post… The topic of week 2 in Sari’s photo Projekt 52:
Time