
…a new theme! Of course not as blurred as this teaser screenshot.
About time after about one year…
(Which is also the resaon why there’s not that much going on here these past and coming days.)

…a new theme! Of course not as blurred as this teaser screenshot.
About time after about one year…
(Which is also the resaon why there’s not that much going on here these past and coming days.)
… and a preliminary solution:
The WordPress plugin “Ajax Edit Comments” from The Reader Appreciation Project1 allows the commenter to edit his comment for a certain time – useful especially for typos and minor corrections. (Admins can do more.) Visitors utilize it here for about every 10th comment, by the way.
Now Pierre notified me yesterday about the high number of database queries (and that the response time could be better, too) – higher than what I always saw when logged in. (See the blue footer line.) Doing a little research, I found that it’s the aforementioned Ajax Edit Comments that uses 4 additional database queries for each comment in order to check if the visitor is allowed to edit it (unles (s)he’s logged in as admin who is always allowed to edit). That can sum up to quite a lot if there are many comments on a single post.
I quickly added a little modification to the plugin2 which check the comment age in advance without database access – in my quick tests, these modifications appear to work fine. If you too don’t see any problems – feel free to test it here or maybe later for the music quiz on 16:00 – I will, of course, send the changes to the plugin’s author, hoping they will be included in future versions.
Now what are the results – as far as they concern myself – of the incredible TV muck, erm, “experiment” called “Uri Geller live – Ufos & Aliens” about which I reported more or less live?
The ratings were surprisingly low, rather disastrous for ProSieben – here’s the top 5 of Saturday’s primetime (source: teletexts):
| Station | Show | Viewers aged 3+ |
Marktet share | Viewers 14-49 years |
Market share |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat.1 | Chronicles of Narnia (movie) | 5.56 Mio. | 18.9% | 3.25 Mio | 27.6% |
| RTL | Das Supertalent (casting show) | 5.55 Mio. | 18.8% | 3.09 Mio. | 26.2% |
| ARD | Musikantenstadl (“folk” music) | 5.32 Mio. | 17.8% | ||
| ZDF | Unter Verdacht (TV movie) | 4.57 Mio. | 15.2% | ||
| Pro7 | Uri Geller live | 1.40 Mio. | 4.8% | 0.85 Mio. | 7.3% |
| Rerun on Sunday morning | 0.54 Mio. | 6.1% | 0.38 Mio. | 8.6% | |
Now does ARD being that far ahead of Pro7 speak for the intelligence of the TV audience or against it…?
Seems people think that I’m not just a spiritual healing teacher, but also a travel organization… anyway, there was a phone call this morning – since I couldn’t take it at that time, I wanted the answering machine to take it; however that didn’t record it so I only was able to hear parts of it (thanks to speakerphone) – in which a lady referred to my comment on a free vacation from a TV magazine (where only 3 out of 255 dates were actually free).
Actually, she didn’t refer to my comment, but simply to the fact that it’s got the headline “Free VIP vacation”, since she was asking something like whether I were in charge of that, etc., she’d like to travel from the Köln-Bonn airport…
…then the connection was cut – though probably not because the lady noticed she’s at the wrong address; I rather think the answering machins’s to blame (gotta look into that), since she then wrote a mail stating that she’d won a free VIP vacation and wanted to know the total costs with all extra fees for a specific date. And after I had answered that mail, she called again and explained everything (and also apologized).
The fact that she, being (probably) Italian, don’t speak perfect German is, however, in my opinion no reason to assume that, given my post headline, I were such a travel organization – no, exactly that organization from which she won the vacation, from which she actually got a phone number, but that was such an expensive one, she said –, and directly clicks her way to my contact page without reading any of the text beneath the headline. I hope she understands it now, but I’m not completely sure…
I’m really wondering how people like her even manage to learn about such a vacation if they obviously don’t read what they got in front of them.

Konna published his comment statistics and thoughts (German) on Thursday – and I thought I could present a few numbers, too.
Now my blog can’t keep up with his regarding the number of comments1, but anyway: There are 3723 entries stored in the comment database that are not spam – including
Like Konna, I’ll now look at the distribution between men (“Männer” in the graphics) and women (“Frauen”) who gave at least five comments – left: commentators, right: comments:

37 men (64.9%) wrote 995 comments (60.9%), that’s an average of 26.9. And 20 women (35.1%) wrote a total of 640 comments (39.1%), average 32.
We see: More men wrote more comments in total, but each woman wrote more than each man.
The Top 10:

Funny that Konna is here at position 6 just as I am at his. ![]()
In total, there were 78.4 comments per month (or 95.2 if I include trackbacks like Konna did) and 2.6 (or 3.1) per day – however, there wasn’t much going on in the first three quarters (including posts). So there were 1920 comments (94.2%!) in the past 12 months (160.0 per month, 5.2 per day; or 2289 incl. trackbacks, 190.8/month, 6.3/day) – and only 119 in the 14 months before that!
A great “commentator magnet” is, of course, my music quiz – if I ignore its 35 posts, there are only 1393 comments (without trackbacks) since the start of my blog, i.e. 53.6 per month and 1.8 per day, or 1274 in the past 12 months, i.e. 106.2 per month and 3.5 per day. (And since there are noticebly more men than woman, this explains the entire men/woman distribution.)
Still better than the average of all blogs registered at Blogoscoop – which is below 1 comment per day including those from the blog’s owners –, but there’s still room for improvement – so get writing! ![]()
For those who are interested: Show the SQL queries used here. ▼