Category Archives:

Internet

Playing lotto without panties – the statistics

Lotto ticket and thong Now that the jackpot has been hit: Some little search and visitor statictics of the past two weeks (search queries (which I’ve translated) have a grey background (usually not in the feed readers)):

Which lotto numbers could I play?

All possible lottonumbers! Free choice, just pick six of the 49 boxes. But can the lotto number ability? Maybe. What wanted?

Can someone predict lotto numbers? Oh, I see. No! And over 1000 people wanted to know about that until Tuesday afternoon, before 1blu struck, and from noon Wednesday, when things were starting back up again, plus 150 interested about statistics and 80 looking for the “best” numbers, and the line between that and prediction dreams are certainly blurred. (Plus those that the analysis didn’t catch. And without 1blu’s foulness at the domain move, there would have been an estimated 400-600 more.)

But it’s impossible, neither lotto number astrology (by the way: abolish astrology/span> – I’m all for it) nor lotto number numerology (what is numerology? balderdash!) nor the useless global scaling/hartmut müller lotto prognoses help, just as lotto numbers from god or lotto numbers god would play won’t help, since he doesn’t interfere with gambling (German). ;)

The distance between the lotto balls, by the way, is often 0 in the drawing machine, since they are touching each other in there.

Lotto numbers what to do with all that money? With these little chances, I wouldn’t stress my brain with these thoughts too much, for in the end, it’s often enough like this: have 2 numbers plus additional number – and you won’t get anything for that.

The pantiless Christina Aguilera

…was, of course, another hot topic (about 1300x searchers (only?) according to analysis; not in Google’s index for some time) – some weren’t even able to spell it correctly due to their horny excitement:
aaguilera, agilera, agiliera, aguielera, aguiera, aguilaera, aguiler, aguileira, aguillera, aquilera, chistina, christine, kristina; wthout, withou panties, without pantanties.

The result of the search for Christina Aguilera anti web sites might also be interesting…

But pantilessness is en vogue elsewhere, too:

Birthday without panties and without panties on the Oktoberfest goes without saying, and, erm, Waltraud without panties – not you too, mother?? :) It gets really interesting with outdoors without panties and completely without panties, just be careful with without panties in winter, lest icicles form. Also valid with underwear if your answer to the question can men wear women’s thongs is Yes, and then the space is too small…


That’s almost all for this time. An important hint at the end: Don’t go looking for a toilet on the internet, that won’t help!

PS: Of age and interested in how the photo above came into being? :eyebrow:

Yes » show me! ▼

#*%&$1#$ &§$%=!

1blu-Leer-Fehler

Due to 1blu, this domain’s old hoster, switching it promptly with the termination confirmation to an empty “new website…” page outside my scope of influence instead of keeping it pointed to the old webspace – as it should be – until the move has been completed, nothing was accessible here since tuesday afternoon… sorry.

:motz:

Anyway, welcome on the new server at all-inkl.com (partner link), where since about 11:45 today the first visitors whose DNS servers had been updated started to arrive. And may have been disappointed, because most of them were looking for predictions for hitting the lotto jackpot. :mrgreen:

Want something to laugh about? From the 1blu termination confirmation (translated by me):

We regret you termination and would be pleased to welcome you as a customer of 1blu again at a later time.

:lol2:

The gayest site on the web! [Update]

No, not this one here. It’s the “Conservapedia”, self-proclaimed “trustworthy encyclopedia” with lots of information “information” and “educational” articles of American arch conservatives. At least that’s what Skepchick Rebecca – she also created a nice graphic for this award – says with regard to the Conservapedia’s statistics:

Most viewed pages

1. Main Page‎ [1,951,628]
2. Homosexuality‎ [1,811,919]
3. Homosexuality and Hepatitis‎ [518,399]
4. Homosexuality and Parasites‎ [453,067]
5. Gay Bowel Syndrome‎ [429,888]
6. Homosexuality and Promiscuity‎ [422,592]
7. Homosexual Couples and Domestic Violence‎ [374,457]
8. Homosexuality and Gonorrhea‎ [332,264]
9. Homosexuality and Anal Cancer‎ [294,854]
10. Homosexuality and Mental Health‎ [294,226]

:lol2:

Update 27 Nov: Apparently these numbers were “slightly” fudged using bots, for the fun(?) of it – see the comments at Infothought. It seems, though, that the folks from Conservapedia don’t mind (see comment from the “anonymous coward” loc.cit.)…

200, or: So many questions…

This is post # 200 in this li’l blog o’ mine (don’t get confused by the number in the URL, that one also counts drafts, pages and uploads). I know, others might just raise a light smile, at best, at these numbers, but… so be it.

To let this post have some meaning, I’m gonna “answer” a few questions that I have been approached with through the search engines (and I’ve translated the German ones for you):

  • give it to me baby ah ah
    Sure. Let’s start!
  • baby can you listen to me
    I’m all ears, go ahead.
  • do you think you can fool me eric
    Wrong door, there’s no Eric here.
  • what the best birthday letter that i give to my honey :kussm:
    Ooooh, that’s a hard problem, who understands the women anyway? Sorry, can’t help you, I don’t want to risk that my suggestion might not be the right one for your lady…
  • how can it be that none of the deeper questions cross your mind? are you afraid to find surprises?
    And you are asking me that? (But at least you are using question marks!)
  • lotto higher winning chance which numbers should i take
    Well, if you’d only knew that in advance… but with selling pretended prognoses, it appears, there’s more money to be made than with using them yourself…

Continue Reading »